SAP & ERP Consulting from the Customer Point of View

SAP implementation ROI, SAP architecture, & SAP business solutions

ERP vs. ERP II vs. ERP III Future Enterprise Applications

May 31st, 2010

ERP vs ERP ii vs ERP iiiAbstract on ERP I, ERP II, & ERP III

ERP applications integrate enterprise operations within and across enterprise legal entities, or company codes. ERP ii (or ERP 2) applications extend supply functionality to external enterprises (generally vendor-affiliated companies or enterprises) to reduce cost, improve supply chain efficiency, and to perform collaborative innovation.  ERP iii (or ERP 3)enterprises go to the next level of integrating the ERP and ERP ii functionality to include customers and the sales side of the marketplace in general.

Moving To the Border-less Enterprise

I’ve heard and read lots of material about the enterprise applications and what the next generation of ERP is.  Some have suggested that ERP systems were just manufacturing tools (see e.g. ERPwire article on major differences between ERP vs. ERP ii).  They then suggested the next generation of ERP systems, or ERP ii systems, were little more than an extension of ERP functionality to new industry sectors.  In my opinion this is a completely misplaced assessment.  Just changing industry sectors does not change what an ERP application does so a broader definition is more appropriate.

Before we go into the details and background of each of the 3 generations of enterprise applications here are my definitions for ERP, ERP ii, and ERP iii systems:

ERP Definition

An ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system integrates virtually all operational business functions and processes and automates entries to finance and reporting within the enterprise (the legal entity or entities that make up an entire company no matter where its operations are).  ERP systems focus almost exclusively on operational excellence value propositions of process efficiency and automation.

ERP II (or, in other words second generation ERP, ERP 2) Definition

Through collaboration, SOA, and other interface, data exchange, or interaction methods the ERP ii systems move beyond Enterprise boundaries (or a basic ERP system) and into the vendor space including the supply, design, and engineering collaboration areas. ERP ii systems continue to enhance operational excellence and start to introduce a measure of the innovation value proposition.

ERP III (or, in other words third generation ERP, ERP 3) Definition

Through collaboration, direct contact, social media, and various data streams within and outside of the enterprise ERP iii integrates marketplace fans and critics into the extended ERP and ERP ii organizations.  From this integration of the customer and vendor a constructive dialog and exchange of information is created to innovate, produce, and then sell / distribute better products or services.  This closes the value proposition loop by going outside of the enterprise boundaries and finding ways to bring customer input, needs, wants, and insight into the enterprise.  ERP iii system create a strong synergy between innovation and customer focus.

ERP System Definition or ERP Defined

The acronym ERP literally stands for “Enterprise Resource Planning.”  And this is exactly where I disagree with the ERPwire definition proposal.  Just a manufacturing system is not an “enterprise” system at all.  It is merely a manufacturing system, or an MES (Manufacturing Execution System).

As the university studies and academic literature note, ERP systems are “a single instance of data, a full process chain of dependencies” (see Change Management Strategies and Knowledge Transfer Processes for a Successful SAP Project citing Kallinikos, 2004). In the ERP industry we (consultants and integrators) frequently refer to any ERP system as a type of “back office” application or system.  By “back office” we are referring to company centered business functions into a single database, or, a single “system of record.”  “Back office” processes are fully within the border and boundary of the enterprise.

In 2000, in an article addressing ERP ii, Gartner noted that they had defined ERP in 1990:

In 1990, Gartner defined ERP, establishing a new vision for the resource planning domain. That vision centered on resource planning and inventory accuracy, as well as visibility beyond the plant and throughout the manufacturing enterprise, regardless of whether the enterprise was a process manufacturer, discrete manufacturer or both. ERP has since appeared in different “flavors.” Extended ERP reflected the fact that many nonmanufacturing industries turned to ERP systems for “backbone” financial transaction processing capabilities (Bond, et. al., 2000 pg. 2, note 2).

That article went on to note that the accepted definition (in 2000 and beyond) had become:

Despite [the] original definition, ERP has become the accepted term for back-office transaction processing systems, regardless of the industry or region (Bond, et. al., 2000 pg. 3).

The definition I have provided is as comprehensive as the original Gartner proposal and includes the later understanding of the application to more industries and business functions.

ERP Focuses on the Operational Excellence Value Proposition

This site provides a much more detailed explanation of the functions and operations of an ERP system like SAP under the section “What is SAP?” ( http://www.r3now.com/define-sap ).

I generally try to categorize all system efforts and business functions into one of three “value proposition” buckets–, operational excellence (ERP), innovation (ERP ii), and customer focus (ERP iii).  The ERP context is almost exclusively focused on the “operational excellence” portion of business “back office” transactional processing.

ERP vs. ERP ii — What is ERP ii?

The next generations of Enterprise applications, or ERP ii systems, extend the “back office” ERP system processing to the extended supply chain.  They extend the enterprise into the supply chain outside of their legal entity borders as an active participant. This would include VMI (Vendor Managed Inventory) processing and KANBAN type demand and supply signals to vendors for JIT (Just In Time) stock management.  But it goes far beyond that, it is the “innovation” portion of the value proposition that is addressed here.

SAP includes ERP ii type extended supply chain applications like SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) and APO (Advanced Planning and Optimization) to help move the supply chain beyond the enterprise borders.

ERP II Creates Collaboration Hubs Beyond Planning Functions and Distribution Functions

Together with the extended supply chain applications there are a number of various exchanges such as common catalogs that are published to the web and integrate with their customer ordering.   Some examples of external exchanges can be seen in initiatives such as “Covisint” for the automotive industry, or Grainger’s online catalog system (although it is not a competitive based platform like Covisint), and many others.

One of the key functions or features of ERP ii systems is supply chain or vendor collaboration, which extends to engineering design and development.  Most enterprises using SRM systems use this to focus on cost reductions, vendor competition, and supply chain efficiencies.  They are generally geared to the “operational excellence” system domain but there is a LOT of untapped possibility.

The highest and best use of ERP ii functionality includes active collaboration with vendors to reduce cost, improve quality, reduce extended supply chain cycle times, and even co-engineer (or co-develop) better products and services.

Many ERP ii solutions now include some type of built-in “reverse auctions” where companies can place requirements out for competitive bids in various formats.  These exchanges might include data interchange methods such as EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) or other standards compliant communication protocols, but they are much more, they are active collaboration hubs.  Together with these collaboration hubs, SOA extensions are being used to extend collaboration and engineering design work to the extended supply chain.

How Has SAP Implemented ERP ii System?

SAP has created an entire collaboration network called the SAP Community Network or SCN (http://scn.sap.com) where customers, vendors, consultants, and any interested party can exchange information, ideas, or dialog.  SAP has implemented ERP ii systems internally through the development of specialized vendor partnerships it calls an “Ecohub” (http://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/).  This is a place where vendors, partners, or other firms with specialized SAP solutions can integrate and promote their offerings to enhance SAP’s various software offerings.  Along with that there are code exchanges, “how-to” articles, discussion forums, and many other types of collaborative information exchanges.  This is similar to what I proposed a few years ago when I wrote “SAP, ERP III, SOA — Learning Organizations through Social Media Collaboration.”

Operational Excellence and Innovation Value Propositions

ERP ii systems integrate the external vendors and suppliers into enterprise processes so that they can directly impact productivity, cost, and efficiency.  Some elements of ERP ii include engineering staff augmentation, free or at a very reasonable rate to the “customer company,” and as a value added service from vendors.  For vendors the ability to augment engineering functions can mean customer retention; for the customer companies this may mean higher quality and lower cost products or services.

SAP’s ERP offerings include PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) with CAD integration for several off the shelf CAD programs.  Although the PLM functionality is primarily used for internal engineering processes it can be pushed out into the extended supply chain for collaborative engineering and design.  That collaboration can be used for innovation if it is properly structured and implemented.  This is in conjunction with other integrated application offerings such as SRM and APO.

By extending engineering or collaboration functions outside of the enterprise, but still within the supply chain, innovation can be introduced into the ERP ii enterprise (see the entire series on Process Execution of Business and IT Innovation).   However, the primary feature of ERP ii systems is the additional operational excellence that is brought about by extended supply chain processing.  Very few companies have succeeded at collaborating with the extended supply chain by introducing extended engineering capabilities, or vendor insight to produce significant innovation.  Most ERP ii systems only work to extend the supply chain beyond the boundaries of the enterprise for cost savings and efficiencies (operational excellence).

Using SOA (Service Oriented Architecture) for Creating ERP ii and ERP iii Enterprises

The promise of ERP ii system success that moves toward ERP iii (discussed in a moment) is SOA or Service Oriented Architecture.

In layman’s terms, SOA is the ability to create a set of “talking points” from any internal system to external systems. 

They are the data structures and data schemas that are published for other systems to interact with and begin to create the framework for the “borderless enterprise.”

ERP iii Defined, What is ERP iii and How Does it Go Beyond ERP ii?

ERP iii addresses the final domain of enterprise class applications by addressing the customer focus value proposition.  It is the extension of technology capabilities which brings collaboration with customers and the broader marketplace into the enterprise system.  This goes way beyond what we currently refer to as CRM (Customer Relationship Management) systems of today.  Today’s CRM applications still operate within the walls of the enterprise and are generally used for managing the sales force rather than moving the enterprise out into the wider marketplace and to direct interaction with customers.

ERP iii from a high level is fairly easy to define, however what it looks like in a few years is difficult to predict.  The areas that ERP iii touches are in a rapid state of change because of the dynamic nature of social media and the global marketplace.

ERP iii Defined

ERP applications integrate enterprise operations within and across enterprise legal entities, or company codes. ERP ii applications extend supply functionality to external enterprises (generally vendor-affiliated companies or enterprises) to reduce cost, improve supply chain efficiency, and to perform collaborative innovation.  ERP iii enterprises go to the next level of integrating the ERP and ERP ii functionality to include customers and the sales side of the marketplace in general.

The end state of the ERP iii enterprise would include a dialog between customers (and potential customers), the ERP organization, and the extended supply chain so that even suppliers would participate in the sales side of the marketplace.  Because there is little or no information in the markeplace about ERP iii direction and design I am offering a more detailed definition here:

Through collaboration, direct contact, social media, and various data streams within and outside of the enterprise ERP iii integrates marketplace fans and critics into the extended ERP and ERP ii organizations.  From the integration of customers and vendors beyond the enterprise boundaries a constructive dialog or information exchange is created to innovate, produce, and then sell (or distribute) better products or services.

ERP iii will create the “borderless enterprise” by bringing together a host of technology sources such as:

  • Collaboration tools (within the enterprise and across the supply chain and marketplace)
  • Social media
  • Internet technologies
  • SOA
  • Smart information integration and synthesis (specialized search with analytics or within specific information domains).  An early example of this type of search is a web service called “Lijit.”  Lijit allows you to manually assign searchable information sources for a customized, high value “search engine.”
  • Extended marketing analytics that are “like” tracking cookies but less invasive and use additional sources of information and research beyond the web (a good example is like grocery store checkout programs that automatically print coupons on the back of your store receipts based on what you just purchased).
  • Direct customer collaboration (we see early examples of this in the Dell “designed by me” and “I made Windows 7” television commercial marketing campaigns).

The Future of ERP iii Systems

Within the extended SAP enterprise (which is my area of expertise) I see many of the seeds of ERP iii germinating and beginning to grow.  Even though the initial “green shoots” are there for an ERP iii revolution I don’t anticipate that occurring for several years within SAP.

Today SAP has:

  • Very active, country specific SAP User Groups (xSUG, in America is it ASUG) with “influence councils”
  • Community forums (previously mentioned)
  • “Mentor Groups” within the community network.

While these all contain the seeds of ERP iii outlets I do not see a lot of the raw material being converted into application enhancements to directly address business marketplace demands.  There are still way too many technical solutions for for technical needs and not enough for genuine business needs.

ERP iii integrates marketplace fans and critics into the extended ERP and ERP ii organizations to innovate, produce, and then sell (or distribute) “customer-centric” products or services.

I doubt that the integration of more social media will move the ERP iii needle much further.  SAP like any other company that embarks on this type of transformational exercise must begin to use their well established outlets to drive innovation and to meet marketplace requirements (see the entire series on Process Execution of Business and IT Innovation).

Social Media and ERP iii

Social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and other resources will need to become more sophisticated to produce meaningful differences in business-centered innovation or customer focus.  That sophistication for business will mean finding a means to use those outlets for genuine business competitive advantage.

It will take business some time to find new ways to tap into the collective marketplace consciousness through social media in spite of the massive number of what I refer to as “snake oil sales” people.  Social media in the enterprise will not be useful until the snake oil sales finally align actual business needs to areas of the enterprise (sales, marketing, HR recruiting, etc.) that align with business goals and directions (see Social Media Fads and the Risk to the Enterprise).

Before ERP iii systems are ready for the extended marketplace and for customer interaction it will require “back office” integration with social media (see ERP III – Is the Integration of Collaboration the Future of Enterprise Applications).

As social media and collaboration tools mature over the next 10 or more years then corporations will finally build the ERP iii systems for integration into the wider marketplace.  By then the ERP ii systems will have finally matured to the point that some of them can provide meaningful integration between the enterprise, the entire supply chain and the sales side of the marketplace in general.

ERP, ERP ii, and ERP iii Conclusion

Considering this specialized class of business systems through the lens of the high level value propositions of 1) operations, 2) innovation, and 3) customers; here is my summary:

ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning)

Primarily focused on the “back office” with a heavy emphasis on operations, automation, cost control, financial activity, and lagging business indicators of performance.

ERP ii (the second generation of Enterprise Resource Planning)

Extends “back office” processing functions and operations into the extended supply chain with a heavy emphasis on supply chain automation, additional efficiency, more cost control, and some vendor collaboration for limited innovation.  This area of the application moves into the “last mile” of improvements that can be more expensive to implement and yield lower returns.  However, carried out properly with significant supply chain collaboration and joint engineering or development efforts this can provide new / innovative products or services addressing both lagging indicators of cost control and efficiency while exploring leading indicators of new products or services.

ERP iii (the next generation of Enterprise Resource Planning)

This will encompass the integration of social media with new marketplace intelligence and analytics into the ERP ii enterprise.  With a very simply “hub and spoke” idea, the enterprise will constitute the “hub” and the extended supply chain vendors, engineers, and designers, together with customers and market analysis as some of the “spokes.”  This will be enabled by the ERP application that is extended with collaboration and social media tools.  The ERP, ERP ii, and ERP iii functions will all be integrated with new analytics and “smart source” search methods to integrate and synthesize trend, market, and product or service information.  This will close the loop on the ERP ii innovation and will bring a new customer focused business paradigm into the enterprise that goes far beyond today’s CRM applications.

ERP iii state companies will be marketplace disrupters who are agile, nimble, and global.  They will be able to spot emerging trends and unmet customer demands (needs or wants) far more quickly and with greater ability than their peers.  From those trends and customer needs these companies will be able to quickly execute innovation programs to develop new products and services to quickly fill those customer demands.  The most advanced of these new “disruptive innovators” will be the companies who can intelligently synthesize all of the various data points to understand customer demands that are not even articulated.

======================

Bond, B., Genovese, Y., Miklovic, D., Wood, N., Zrimsek, B., and Rayner, N. (2000). ERP Is Dead — Long Live ERP II; Gartner Publications.

Kallinikos, J. (2004), “Deconstructing Information Packages. Organizational and Behavioral Implications of ERP Systems.” Information Technology and People, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 8-30.

Related Posts:

Striving for a Customer Focused Approach to Innovation 3 of 3

April 5th, 2010

Where is the market goingIn the first two parts of this series we looked at the current innovation paradigm.  That paradigm consists mostly of two primary approaches being an incremental one that looks more like continuous improvement and a free for all that is more like chaos.  We also looked at a possible approach to innovation by leveraging existing marketing infrastructure to produce a future state narrative.  That narrative acts as a future state blueprint for product or service development to move toward. 

Innovation Begins with Customer Collaboration

 Customer collaboration is more than surveys, polls, focus groups, or social media input.  Even though these can all be components of a collaboration strategy, several of the approaches are one way when what is needed is a customer dialog and customer engagement.  Outlets like Twitter, Facebook, or some type of forum software help create a dialog but if a company is not ready to hear the truth about their products they may be in for a shock.  For example, see the second half of the following post under the section entitled “A Technology Change that will Force You to Work More Closely with Customers .“

For any company that does not already have an open forum it will be critical to add this to your application portfolio.  This external forum is the first real bridge to customer integration.  Full collaboration integration into ERP applications like SAP is possible by taking a focused approach to how the application is used (SAP, ERP III, SOA — Learning Organizations through Social Media Collaboration).  Properly deployed collaboration tools do not need to be expensive, complicated, or difficult and properly implemented they can transform organizations (ERP III – Is the Integration of Collaboration the Future of Enterprise Applications).

SAP has been very successful at creating a pair of portals which integrate customers, consultants, and vendors into the process and product development through its customer ASUG (Americas SAP User Group), SCN (SAP Collaboration Network), and their partner Eco System (vendor participation).  These are all tremendous examples of how SAP as a company is integrating meaningful social media tools and collaboration initiatives fully into the Enterprise. 

Just how successful is this? 

Although media outlets made a huge issue out of the ASUG based “rebellion” of the customer base over SAP’s proposed maintenance fee increase, it is a testament to the importance and power of collaboration with end customers.  Although SAP may have considered the backlash over maintenance fees a failure, it should be considered instead as satisfying customer expectations.  After all, the global economy has been struggling, competitors like Rimini Street have targeted application support, and customers have long questioned what they get for the support.  A successful press to increase maintenance fees would have likely led to wholesale defections of customers to Rimini Street and would have created a massive market opportunity for other support vendors.  The mass defection to support vendors like Rimini Street could have easily cost far more than just the lost maintenance fees, it could have cost significant upgrade revenues as well.

What can You Do to Create Customer Focused Innovation?

The first and most obvious place to start is to glean a measure of customer intelligence to understand their frustrations with the current marketplace and their desires (Business Strategy and IT Strategy to Reproduce Apple Innovation).  Some type of forum, or other discussion mechanism freely available to customers for feedback is a good place to start.  Company managers and employees should be required to participate in those forum discussions to begin to gain greater insight into the customer perspective, including their frustrations, desires, and concerns.

From that exchange many of the customer drivers can be derived to begin assembling the innovation narrative around new products or services, or around significant improvements to existing products or services. 

The thing to remember here is that you don’t have to create the “miracle” product or service.  You don’t even need to create the product or service that meets the “ideal state,” you only need a product or service that is noticeably better and different than your competitors.  Within the framework of the narrative you can continue to move your products ahead by making them more and more like the “ideal state” narrative over time.

Great Employees Make for Great Customer Experience

Facebook as an Inexpensive Marketing Outlet and Employee Recruiting Tool

Facebook may work well as an inexpensive marketing channel for promotions and offers.  As such, properly constructed, you might be able to “train” an extended customer base to visit Facebook for new offers or promotions.  However, I personally see a different application for Facebook in particular.  I believe its utility is best served as an employee recruiting tool.

Tools like Facebook have a legitimate place in the enterprise even though a recent Harvard Business Review case study demonstrated that their use for businesses with huge customer bases is limited (Social Media Fads and the Risk to the Enterprise).  They do serve a purpose if properly connected to a specific business purpose.  Toward that end, Facebook in particular can generate a “tribe” of loyal customers who might make the best pool of potential employees to recruit from.  What the Harvard study showed was that Facebook was most likely to attract those who are already fans, and who would make the best employees of your company?  True fans as employees are far more likely to be satisfied and far more likely to produce a good customer experience for others as your employees.  They are also much more likely to defend the brand and to actively engage in meaningful dialog with customers to understand where there might be opportunities for innovation.

Conclusion

I’ve provided a few examples and a starting place for a framework for customer focused innovation.  As I previously laid out in a post entitled “From Collaboration to Innovation to Market – Toward a Working Model” there is a rational approach to innovation in the enterprise:

Conceive

  • Collaborate (technology integration)
  • Gather intelligence and research
  • Ideas (customer immersion narrative)
  • Socialize (customers, employees, other stakeholders)

Develop

  • Prioritize (emerging trend or fad)
  • Prototype (mock-ups, story boards, paper prototypes, actual working models)
  • Pilot (finalize design, costing, materials or talent, etc.)

Market

  • Market trial
  • Refinement
  • Sales Campaign

This collection of posts has been an initial attempt to bring some definition or a starting framework to an area that has little guidance and little academic research.  The whole area of innovation seems to be a black box to most.  This has been a bit more of a challenge than I had originally expected and I expect that as I continue to toy with these ideas and approaches that something more concise will eventually emerge.  To that end I would be curious about your feedback and input if you have been so courageous as to look through the material.

Related Posts:

Striving for a Customer Focused Approach to Innovation 2 of 3

March 29th, 2010

elevation to completionPreviously we looked at the three primary types of “innovation” most often practiced today.  Two polar opposites being what I call the Stoic approach or the Maelstrom, where the Stoic is more like continuous improvement and the Maelstrom is more like blue sky directionless brainstorming.  The third method is somewhere in between and is more of a striving for the ideal future state.  That third method relies heavily on an “innovation narrative.”

Innovation at the Point of Customer Frustration, Whether it is Articulated or Not

Previously I published a post on Apple’s innovation techniques and that my personal analysis of Apple’s approach showed it really wasn’t magic, “Business Strategy and IT Strategy to Reproduce Apple Innovation.”  Apple’s approach, as telegraphed by Steve Jobs, has always been to address customer frustration points or areas of strong customer desire that the marketplace is not addressing.

As an example, the other day I saw a Dyson vacuum cleaner advertisement.  After addressing the innovations of a bag-less vacuum, and replacing the wheels with a large pivot ball Mr. Dyson said their mission was simple, to “solve the obvious problems others seem to ignore.”  This is the perfect example of developing innovative solutions around customer frustrations.  In this case the vacuum cleaner bag and wheels had become so accepted and routine that it is doubtful many customers articulated those problems. 

The same innovative approach requires a business to understand their customers, intimately know what they are looking for and why, and then understand what the frustrations or the limitations of the current products or services are.  From there a narrative of the new product or service can be created, innovated, piloted, adjusted, and then rolled out to the marketplace.

The key to innovation success is to directly connect all innovation efforts to a specific customer or business purpose.  That connection requires you to get close enough to your customers and your marketplace to understand their frustrations, but also their difficult to articulate desires. 

Today’s Innovation is Often More About the “Creative Maelstrom” than Innovation

Innovation purists would not agree with the limitations or restrictions on the process that I have proposed.  But innovation purists also live in a creative fantasyland where they do not allow constraints like budgets, deadlines, practical application, or other real-world considerations to get in the way of their creative maelstrom.

An ugly reality for the “creative purists” who insist that is what innovation requires is the limitations of business.  Businesses of all kinds have limited resources, limited capital, and limited ability to create new things.  So an effective method to reduce the amount of time and cost to create new products or services is needed.  And not just time to market with some incremental change or enhancement, but completely new products or services.

On the other hand, many businesses are far too restrictive and shortsighted on what they refer to as “innovation.”  What many call “innovation” is a pursuit of small, incremental changes that yield smaller and smaller benefits over time.   This type of “innovation” is usually minor adjustments of existing products or services.  And while this focus on continuous improvement is useful for controlling costs, quality, and even customer satisfaction, it rarely produces innovative breakthroughs.  If an innovative breakthrough occurs within the context of continuous improvement it is generally on a micro scale (dealing with a small component or feature of a product or service) and rarely on a macro scale (a completely new design departure for a totally new product or service).

Stretch Innovation Examples with the Application of the Innovation Narrative

A very reasonable approach to innovation of new products or services is similar to that taken by Thomas Edison or Alexander Graham Bell. 

When Edison set out to invent the light bulb he was trying to solve a particular problem–, that problem was known and in some of the historical literature he was quite aware of the “ideal future state” he was trying to achieve.  He wanted to bring light to the darkness without the use of fire.  He sought to solve a customer focused problem by replacing the use of fire and fuel oils with an electric bulb.  The idea was to eliminate the risks of fire hazard or noxious fumes that the current flame based technology presented.

Edison’s relentless pursuit and passionate drive to produce a light bulb shows his understanding of pursuing an ideal future state innovation narrative, even if it wasn’t spelled out like modern mission and vision statements.

The same could be said of Alexander Graham Bell.  Bell’s narrative was that he wanted people who were far away to be able to talk to each other as if they were next door.  Bell’s was also a relentless pursuit of an ideal future state innovation narrative even if the narrative wasn’t written on paper.

The difference with this approach and those great history-making inventors is the addition of a structured approach to defining and then articulating the innovation effort.  To that end I have devised a very simple approach, or the beginnings of a process model, for moving from innovation to market “From Collaboration to Innovation to Market – Toward a Working Model.”

Creative Writing in the Innovation Process (The “Innovation Narrative”)

I was recently reading an article about a creative writer who was candid about his inability to live up to the authors he admired.  As a result he retooled his creative skills and turned to industrial design.  From what I saw some of the things he created were eye-pleasing (and popular) works of art with a functional design. 

He mentioned that he started the design work because he could construct a narrative to immerse the customer in each individual product.  I’ll call that the “innovation narrative.”

That is certainly an interesting approach and a great use of his creative writing talents.  There isn’t any reason why this type of design methodology couldn’t be used by business and technology.

The Stretch option, or the striving for the future state requires the construction of a narrative which would be similar to a home elevation or artist’s rendering rather than the entire blueprint.  Over time the details of the blueprint are filled in by the innovation architects within an organization.  Those innovation architects “build out” the various parts of the future state through development of new products or services which move toward the ideal future state. 

This type of innovation, design, and prototyping is similar to creating mission and vision statements for a business, but they are product or service focused.  They are discrete and customer or market specific. 

The Innovation Narrative as a Change in Innovative Design Approach

An “innovation narrative” is nothing but a fancy name for a written statement about the end state of a new product or service.  It incorporates positive changes about what customers do not like about a particular product or service with things a customer likes, or desires.  It also looks at un-served, underserved, or completely new applications for the product or service.  The narrative carefully evaluates the marketplace from an outsider’s perspective, or as close as possible from the customer’s perspective to understand where there are unmet desires for a product or service.  This tries to capture a customer’s perspective of “if only I could do X with this…” or “I wish this would…” or in the service sector “why do they…” or “why don’t they…” or “they really should (or should not)…”

Done effectively this narrative then serves as a guiding framework for development of the new products or services.  For products, it generally involves a departure from the current “form, fit, or functions” of current products.  For services, this would involve significant modifications to service delivery methods, quality, and polish or composure.

The skill to create an “innovation narrative” already exists in the marketing departments of most mid and large sized companies.  What is lacking is the capture of the critical data to develop the narrative and its timing. 

Marketing Involvement in Innovation

At many companies marketing involvement frequently occurs after a new or revised product is either conceived or already underway.  The marketing department then sets about how to position that business item and how to help the sales force sell it and generate “buzz” around it.  But if marketing veterans were involved in the early design stages, at what engineering refers to as the “fuzzy front end” they might be able to make a dramatic difference.  They can use their sales and marketing talent and ability to create an “innovation narrative” around what the new product or service should be at final delivery in the marketplace.  They could create that future state product or service that can only happen if they had a magic wand.

Marketing, sales, and engineering or design should be involved right from the beginning.  Talented marketers generally have a fair understanding of how to position products or services and the sales people are responsible for selling them.  By incorporating key sales and marketing people into the early stages of product or service development the entire process becomes more customer-focused. 

The idea here is to create a narrative that contains the details of the customer frustrations and marketplace aspirations.  The narrative should include the “hard stuff” like the articulation of customer aspirations that the marketplace has a hard time articulating.  And it has to be more than just meaningless marketing hype too, it must contain enough detail to immerse the narrative in the customer’s actual perspective about the new product or service.

Related Posts: