SAP & ERP Consulting from the Customer Point of View

SAP implementation ROI, SAP architecture, & SAP business solutions

SAP Program Management Requires a Type of CMMI

November 7th, 2011

SAP Program Management

SAP Program Management

Many may be unaware that SAP provides a broad set of tools and resources for Program Management and Competency Maturity Management (or CMM). Very few are familiar with SAP’s broad set of supports for this purpose such as the “new” ASAP Methodology Phase 6 “Run” enhancement. It is loaded with key information which aligns with Program Management responsibilities and CMMI.

 

So, what is CMM (or CMMI as it is more properly referred to)?

“CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) is a process improvement approach that provides organizations with the essential elements of effective processes, which will improve their performance… CMMI models are collections of best practices that help organizations to dramatically improve effectiveness, efficiency, and quality” [FN1].

The entire CMMI methodology and development is maintained at Carnegie Mellon’s Software Engineering Institute. These CMMI standards have been applied in a vast number of organizations together with various methodologies. The CMMI approach is well suited to engineering and software development, design, or implementation. SAP’s entire ASAP methodology, and especially the “new” Run methodology incorporates a number of CMMI principles.

SAP Program Management is all about Competency Maturity Management (or CMM)

The contract SAP program manager is accountable for providing the key tools, templates, techniques, and resources to ensure projects are properly managed and delivered for business benefit. If they are not providing this type of methodology guidance, including key templates and techniques to deliver business benefit, what are you paying them for?

SAP Program Management or Project Management Gaps

After all these years one of my biggest frustrations is the lack of SAP contract program or project managers use of the ASAP Methodology. They all talk about it, and during sales presentations they use lots of SAP’s material, but as soon as the project begins you never see it. They seem to have absolutely no idea what they are doing.

As I have often said, I never believe that a client / customer of project management or program management services has the primary responsibility for this knowledge. If they did why bother hiring outside help and paying the rates for this service except for that contract “expertise?”

Contract SAP program management or SAP project management that is not able to deliver on clearly understandable methodology development are fakes. Anyone can call themselves a program manager, but what does that mean? What is the contract SAP Program Manager accountable for? What are they on the hook to deliver and how is their performance measured?

Using SAP ASAP and CMMI to Mature the SAP Enabled Enterprise

The SAP ASAP Methodology, in particular the Phase 6 Run section, should be studied by every SAP program manager before they start doing project or program work. Even though it is in the last ASAP Methodology phase, its greatest effectiveness is realized when you begin your internal SAP delivery maturity planning from the beginning of your SAP project.

One of the critical benefits of starting your CMMI related planning right from the beginning is your SAP project can be structured to support business integration at the outset. Using this type of maturity model integration as part of your project guidance can have significant benefits to the enterprise:

“Many CMMI using businesses have beneficial results to their bottom line… including improvements in schedule and cost performance, product and service quality, forecasting accuracy, productivity, customer satisfaction, return on investment, and other measures of performance” [FN2].

SAP has already done a significant amount of the work for you. All your program manager has to do is adjust the plans, alter the templates, follow the ASAP Methodology instructions, and build the resources to support this transition. You really must question SAP program manager service providers who do not keep up with the ASAP tools and delivery methodology that SAP provides and supports.

SAP’s Competency Maturity Model Starting Point

The following maturity model is just one small example of a powerful tool that is critical for long term technology and business integration [FN3]:

Maturity Level

Action Area

Characteristics

IT Support Provider

  • Vision & strategy
  • Governance
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Culture and skills
  • Vision and strategy not formulated
  • Controlled by IT costs, focus on IT operations
  • Processes not defined
  • Isolated tool decisions
  • Focus on IT knowledge

IT Service Partner

  • Vision & strategy
  • Governance
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Culture and skills
  • Strategy derived from IT goals
  • Controlled by IT-focused KPIs
  • Satisfies minimum criteria for SAP solution operations
  • Joint decision about selection
  • Service-oriented, knowledge of SAP solution

Business Support Partner

  • Vision & strategy
  • Governance
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Culture and skills
  • Strategy developed in cooperation with IT management
  • Controlled by measurable service level
  • Established, role-based process organization
  • Defined standards, SLA reporting
  • Customer-oriented

Business Partner

  • Vision & strategy
  • Governance
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Culture and skills
  • Strategy derived from company goals
  • Decisions guided by business requirements
  • Aligned with business process model
  • Integrated business processes and tools
  • Expertise in the areas of business processes, SOA, and integration

Value Partner

  • Vision & strategy
  • Governance
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Culture and skills
  • Strategy as business enabler
  • Controlled on the basis of value contribution for the company
  • Holistic service management lifecycle
  • End-to-end management of business processes
  • Value-oriented, ongoing improvements

This model, provided freely by SAP as part of their standard ASAP methodology is a great starting point. Your contract SAP program manager should be able to use this as it is, or adjust it to fit your particular organizational needs. This is just one very small component of the Run Phase and an even smaller component of the entire ASAP Methodology toolset.

In many cases you would be better off sending your own internal employees to SAP ASAP certification courses and Microsoft Project classes and making use of their new found knowledge. At least then you would have a knowledgeable employee who could help keep an integrator who claims to use ASAP honest. And if they claim to use ASAP in their sales materials or sales pitches GET THAT CLAIM IN YOUR STATEMENT OF WORK AND YOUR CONTRACT WITH THEM!

=====================

For more information on related topics please see:

=====================

[FN1] CMMI Overview: Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, retrieved November 5, 2011. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/

[FN2] Why CMMI: Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, retrieved November 5, 2011. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/why/

[FN3] SAP ASAP Methodology version 7.1, WBS 6.2.1 – Table 1: Maturity Level Characteristics. For more information on the SAP ASAP Methodology please go to http://www.sap.com/services/more/servsuptech/asap.epx

Related Posts:

SAP IT Governance – Achieve Business IT Engagement

October 24th, 2011

SAP Business IT Convergence

Business - IT Convergence

Proper SAP project governance is a function of the business in partnership with IT.  With the exception of a few of SAP’s technical applications (like parts of Solution Manager, HANA, etc.) the entire application suite is about business; business transaction processing and business processes. If key business resources are not directly engaged in SAP project governance you may never realize the SAP benefits you expect.

This brings me to the point of what benefits you expect from an SAP implementation?

From what I have seen there are generally 2 broad “buckets” of benefits on SAP projects.  The first “bucket” is focused on consolidating and eliminating systems while the second is all about transactional business execution.  Or, IT benefits and business benefits.

SAP Project Drivers in IT

The first benefit “bucket” is related to pure IT cost reduction with a focus on consolidating and eliminating legacy systems for many of the following reasons:

  • reducing numerous applications’ license costs
  • narrowing technical infrastructure needs
  • simplifying technical architecture
  • reducing system maintenance costs
  • reducing legacy staffing needs
  • standardizing on a single development platform

If your SAP project is more of a pure landscape play, around replacing legacy systems, then SAP project governance would fall more clearly under IT.  However these types of projects usually end up having the business user community demand that all legacy system functionality be meticulously reproduced in SAP.  In the end you will likely achieve some measure of savings but far less than you originally anticipated.  Any expected savings will generally be consumed through mountains of custom coded solutions which will need continual care, maintenance, and feeding after go-live.  These custom coded “solutions” are not supported by your SAP maintenance agreement and can eat you alive in post-production support costs.

SAP Project Drivers in the Business

The second benefit “bucket” is related to business processes and business transaction execution producing results such as:

  • improved cycle times
  • greater process automation
  • inter and intra departmental integration
  • unified reporting data
  • improved inventory management
  • better planning capabilities
  • greater supply chain efficiencies
  • faster, more accurate financial closes and statements
  • better operational decision making tools

As you can guess, the list goes on.  The difference here is the focus is on direct engagement and active participation with the business.  This is the real challenge.  A business partnership in your SAP project requires more change management, greater flexibility, and a clear understanding that some business needs will override IT drivers and IT goals.  The goal of well executed SAP project governance is to achieve measurable benefit –, it is more about delivering business objectives and strategic direction. 

IT Governance of the SAP Enabled Organization

When the SAP enabled IT organization is able to deliver on business objectives and focus on strategic direction their role in the enterprise changes.  This SAP change moves the IT organization from being a mere “service provider” (a very expensive cost center) to a critical “value added” business partner. When the SAP IT department is seen as a “service provider” you quickly encounter budget and cost cutting pressure.  As I have previously noted:

In today’s competitive global economy, filled with international economic instability, no part of the enterprise can afford to move very far from what pays the bills.  If your SAP or IT organization is focused completely on technology solutions you lose sight of what is important to the business.  And what is that?  Customers! Customer retention, acquisition, loyalty, satisfaction, and experience.  Without customers there is no growth or revenue.  Without growth or revenue there is no need for that expensive SAP or IT investment…

Without a clearer focus on customers as well as innovation in the enterprise, or “how business gets done,” the SAP and overall IT organization becomes a very expensive operational support layer.  Without the genuine business focus the organization becomes a commodity to be outsourced (see SAP IT Convergence Beyond Business to IT Alignment).

SAP Governance Includes Business to IT Convergence

The whole area of governance and convergence is very closely related.  For effective governance the business direction and integration must be a key component of all SAP or IT initiatives.  When you have that involvement, over time, and with some effort, convergence happens.  It isn’t automatic but the environment for it to occur begins with direct business engagement. 

If the business isn’t in the SAP co-pilots seat you may be headed for a IT crash landing.

If you’re thinking to yourself this “doesn’t apply to me” then you might want to think again.  A recent IBM study found that many corporate lines of business are beginning to make their own independent technology purchase decisions.  And they are doing this outside of the SAP or IT organization.  Add to that Ray Wang’s recent Harvard Business Review Blog Post about the consumerization of [business] IT (see Integrating Business Stakeholders as Part of SAP IT Convergence) and you have a serious issue to contend with.  As his research noted, “corporate tech spending is up by 17 to 20%… [but] spending by IT departments is flat.. business leaders, not their IT colleagues… are driving purchasing decisions.”

Business decision makers are starting to use their own budgets to make their own IT decisions rather than making the contribution to what they see as a very expensive “service provider.” That integration or “convergence” with the business is more important than ever because in the end they have more influence over your budget than you may realize.

For more information on this topic please see these additional posts:

Related Posts:

Steering Committee Governance for an SAP Center of Excellence

July 11th, 2011
Business to IT Convergence with an SAP Center of Excellence

SAP Center of Excellence Governance

This post is based on information from my recent ASUG presentation in Atlanta…  Beyond Technology Alignment – Building a Center of Excellence @ http://bit.ly/jJefxP

————————-

At the intersection of business and IT you have convergence.  At the place of convergence is where the Center of Excellence exists.

————————-

One of the key SAP project success factors is to use a steering committee made up of key business stakeholders.  They can meet once a week or once a month, but generally they are involved to provide business level guidance to an SAP project or IT programs.  The most effective steering committees include at least one executive and several senior leaders from throughout the business (see The Real Reason Executive Participation Creates IT Project Success).

That steering committee performs a critical function over large projects like SAP implementations.  This group is critical to your project’s success because of the amount of time from company employees, capital from the organization’s coffers, and decisions which change the business.

Some of the key functions a steering committee carries out during the course of your SAP project include:

  • Set SAP project scope and then help manage it.
  • Define project objectives and evaluation criteria.
  • Monitor project progress, including key milestones and deliverables progress.
  • Oversee Quality reviews at key check points.
  • Evaluate and mitigate organizational impact of business changes.
  • Promotes the project throughout the organization.
  • Coordinates staffing and resource levels from key business areas.
  • Makes critical decisions which the project team is unable to resolve (escalations or key business decisions).

The ongoing functions and tasks of the SAP steering committee cannot be underestimated. During the course of their duties they gain that list of unique and critical skills related to applying technology to business issues and problems (see Using Your SAP Steering Committee for Business Transformation).

You go live and WHY do you disband your steering committee???

Integrating the SAP – IT Organization Into the Business

In an SAP Center of Excellence, after your SAP implementation goes live, the steering committee functions change to one of developing and managing technology road-maps.  Their skills with scope, schedule, cost, performance, prioritizing, and evaluating risks / rewards are ideally suited to their continued involvement in the application of technology to the business.  But the underlying issue here is that they must continue to function –, they should not be disbanded.

One of the key benefits of continuing to leverage the SAP Steering Committee after the SAP business software goes live is you continue to build on their experience and unique skills.  Even as they rotate out of the steering committee role these individuals move through the ranks of the larger enterprise and take that technology to business integration experience with them.  If they have served on a steering committee long enough to see the benefits technology can bring to the larger enterprise their exposure is invaluable to building a long term Center of Excellence –, an organization dedicated to converging business and technology to meet business marketplace requirements.

These individuals have worked through many key business decisions, budget decisions, scope and schedule decisions, and how to move to technology integration project success.  As a result of their experience applying technology solutions to the business they develop critical skills for the converged and integrated organization, these skills are difficult to replicate.  In a nutshell this steering committee develops a convergence of three critical skills for tomorrow’s powerhouse enterprises: they understand management, technology, and business integration.  Those are the key ingredients to the converged SAP enterprise.

Related Posts: