<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Corporate and Personal Liability for Fake Consultants</title> <atom:link href="http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants</link> <description>SAP implementation ROI, SAP architecture, &#38; SAP business solutions</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: hemen parekh</title><link>http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants#comment-2512</link> <dc:creator>hemen parekh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:02:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3now.com/?p=310#comment-2512</guid> <description>Background   Screening  Trends  --  India
[  DNA  Money  /  Feb. 02. 2011  ]
First Advantage is a background screening company. For the resumes that got referred to them for background screening during July – Sept 2010, their findings are as follows :
	  10.8 % of these resumes contained some or other discrepancy
	  39 % of these provided false info re: company name / employment status / reasons for leaving
	  35% gave incorrect tenure
	  13 % inflated their designations
	  11 % received negative HR / Supervisor feedback
	   2 % inflated their compensation
If the idea is to impress the recruiters, why don’t jobseekers
simply customize their resumes instead of faking the data ?
With regards
hemen  parekh
Jobs  for  All  =  Peace  on  Earth</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Background   Screening  Trends  &#8212;  India<br
/> [  DNA  Money  /  Feb. 02. 2011  ]<br
/> First Advantage is a background screening company. For the resumes that got referred to them for background screening during July – Sept 2010, their findings are as follows :<br
/> 	  10.8 % of these resumes contained some or other discrepancy<br
/> 	  39 % of these provided false info re: company name / employment status / reasons for leaving<br
/> 	  35% gave incorrect tenure<br
/> 	  13 % inflated their designations<br
/> 	  11 % received negative HR / Supervisor feedback<br
/> 	   2 % inflated their compensation<br
/> If the idea is to impress the recruiters, why don’t jobseekers<br
/> simply customize their resumes instead of faking the data ?<br
/> With regards<br
/> hemen  parekh<br
/> Jobs  for  All  =  Peace  on  Earth</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karthik Viswanathan</title><link>http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants#comment-107</link> <dc:creator>Karthik Viswanathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:25:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3now.com/?p=310#comment-107</guid> <description>A lot of times, there is not even a savings involved because even though the cosultant is paid peanuts, the firm representing them charges what that resume would actually command. Translation: Everyone loses except the consulting company who is making a killing for no work delivered.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of times, there is not even a savings involved because even though the cosultant is paid peanuts, the firm representing them charges what that resume would actually command. Translation: Everyone loses except the consulting company who is making a killing for no work delivered.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Wood</title><link>http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants#comment-33</link> <dc:creator>Bill Wood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:16:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3now.com/?p=310#comment-33</guid> <description>Truth is, I don&#039;t know.  Some of it I chalk up to plain old ignorance.  I&#039;ve worked with a lot of well meaning senior IT folks, including some executives, who take on very expensive SAP projects and rely heavily on recruiters or on implementation vendors to do some of the up front background checking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth is, I don&#8217;t know.  Some of it I chalk up to plain old ignorance.  I&#8217;ve worked with a lot of well meaning senior IT folks, including some executives, who take on very expensive SAP projects and rely heavily on recruiters or on implementation vendors to do some of the up front background checking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.r3now.com/corporate-and-personal-liability-for-fake-consultants#comment-32</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:05:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.r3now.com/?p=310#comment-32</guid> <description>Why don&#039;t firms just do the good old fashioned thing, hire talent, and then nuture/train that talent into the roles/positions they desire?
Sure seems to be a lot cheaper than hiring a bunch of foreign H1-B workers with falsified resumes, simply to save a few bucks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t firms just do the good old fashioned thing, hire talent, and then nuture/train that talent into the roles/positions they desire?</p><p>Sure seems to be a lot cheaper than hiring a bunch of foreign H1-B workers with falsified resumes, simply to save a few bucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
